Historians’ Amicus Brief in Relentless v. Department of Commerce
Brennan Center for Justice4 days
SCOTUS Overturns 1984 Precedent, Limiting Federal Agencies' Authority
Image copyright: Anna Moneymaker/Staff/Getty Images News via Getty Images
The Facts
The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Friday issued a 6-3 ruling, along ideological lines, to overturn the court's 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which told courts to defer to executive branch agencies regarding the interpretation of federal laws.
The case began in 2020 when fishermen from Rhode Island and New Jersey challenged a law — imposed by the National Marine Fisheries Service — requiring them to pay for data collection and fishing operation monitors that cost up to $700 per day.
The Spin
Left narrative
If SCOTUS was really looking to reflect the founders' understanding of executive authority, it would've relied on the precedent of federal personnel — including customs officers and tax collectors — being given broad discretion in regulating since the country's earliest days. Instead, SCOTUS has put America's environment and health at risk because judges with no expertise on these matters will be determining regulation.
Right narrative
SCOTUS has taken an important step in reining in the bureaucratic deep state so that unelected, anonymous bureaucrats won't be able to hide behind their so-called expertise when they shove politically motivated regulations into the lives of citizens and their businesses. But this is just a first step because politically-motivated judges will still be able enforce bureaucratic regulations.