Earliest Evidence of Human Fire-Making Discovered in England
Researchers have identified the earliest known evidence of deliberate fire-making at Barnham in Suffolk, dating to about 400,000 years ago, more than 350,000 years earlier than a site in northern France, which had previously been considered the earliest.
According to research published in Nature on Wednesday, evidence includes a reddened hearth and flint hand axes fractured by intense heat. Geochemical tests indicate repeated burning at elevated temperatures exceeding 700°C, consistent with a constructed fire at the exact location.
Two small pyrite fragments were recovered with the hearth; the mineral is not naturally present locally, and when struck against flint, it produces sparks to ignite tinder, indicating the inhabitants could start fires rather than relying on natural flames.
Narrative A
This is the most remarkable breakthrough in understanding human evolution, proving that Neanderthals possessed sophisticated knowledge of the properties of flint and pyrite far earlier than previously imagined. This ability to create and control fire freed humans from dependence on natural fires, enabling them to choose campsites, process a wider variety of foods and fuel brain development that fundamentally transformed survival.
Narrative B
The Suffolk fire claim stretches circumstantial evidence beyond what the data supports, lacking the smoking gun of wear traces on flint tools that definitively prove fire-making at later Neanderthal sites. Fire-making developed through scattered fits and starts across multiple groups, who discovered, lost, and rediscovered the ability over time rather than signifying a singular evolutionary breakthrough.
Nerd narrative
There's a 50% chance that a Neanderthal will be born again after 2099, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
House Passes $900B Defense Bill
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the 2026 fiscal year on Wednesday by 312 votes to 112, authorising nearly $900 billion in military spending.
The bill’s major spending items include over $291.5 billion for operation and maintenance, approximately $234 billion for military personnel and health, roughly $161.7 billion for procurement and nearly $145.7 billion for research and development.
As part of the package, U.S. service members will receive a 3.8% pay increase, a $50 raise in Family Separation Allowance for deployed personnel and an extension of certain expiring bonuses and special pay authorizations for another year until Dec. 31, 2026.
Pro-Trump narrative
The NDAA delivers peace through strength by ensuring that the U.S. military remains the most formidable in the world, while providing troops with the equipment, infrastructure and incentives to perform at their best. Rooting out harmful programs like DEI and climate initiatives is crucial to this, helping restore the U.S. Armed Forces to its core values and warrior ethos.
Anti-Trump narrative
This NDAA shows just how misplaced Congress's priorities are. Rather than fund Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, politicians have chosen to fuel death and destruction instead. This choice is impossible to justify when ordinary Americans are teetering on the edge, unable to put food on the table or afford the health care treatment they desperately need.
Narrative C
For hard-pressed American taxpayers, the NDAA is too large. While the U.S. does face an increasingly challenging geopolitical landscape, spending hundreds of billions of dollars on obsolete or wasteful platforms, such as the F-35, will not make America any safer. Congress should instead reduce and redirect spending to more cost-effective and beneficial platforms for security.
Nerd narrative
There is a 3% chance that any country's military expenditure will exceed that of the United States before 2030, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
Pentagon War Games Warn US Could Lose Taiwan War
Pentagon war games summarized in the classified "Overmatch brief," as described by the New York Times, that China could destroy advanced U.S. weapons before they reach Taiwan and that U.S. forces could lose a Taiwan war even if Washington intervenes.
Simulations cited in the Overmatch brief often show the USS Gerald R. Ford destroyed before reaching Taiwan. The U.S. Navy still plans to build at least nine additional Ford-class aircraft carriers, according to reporting on the assessment.
Both analyses state China has about 600 hypersonic missiles, a stockpile highlighted in scenarios where these weapons could sink carriers and strike U.S. forces at long range during a potential Taiwan conflict modeled in Pentagon and think tank war games.
Pro-establishment narrative
China has fundamentally changed the strategic game in the Pacific by deploying cheap, mass-produced weapons that overwhelm expensive American platforms. The dominant strategy that secured three decades of stability no longer works because Beijing shifted the cost structure, making carriers and forward bases vulnerable to saturation attacks. The U.S. must rapidly redesign its military architecture or face continued losses across all scenarios.
Establishment-critical narrative
The New York Times is manufacturing consent for massive military spending increases by citing unsubstantiated intelligence claims about Chinese invasion timelines and ignoring debunked sabotage allegations. This propaganda push for war preparation with a nuclear power serves imperial interests, not security, while pretending decades of global tyranny constituted defending freedom.
Left narrative
The U.S. should shed legacy weapons, but the deeper issue is clarifying which threats truly matter. Global military dominance is unrealistic, and sprawling bases or a war over Taiwan are not vital interests. Lasting security lies in diplomacy, economic engagement and strengthening defense with key allies — not adopting an adversarial stance, the debate too often assumes.
Nerd narrative
There's a 1.5% chance that there will be active warfare between the U.S. and China before 2027, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
Ghana Deports Three Israelis in Retaliatory Move
Ghana deported three Israeli nationals on Wednesday in what the country's Foreign Minister, Okudzeto Ablakwa, described as "retaliation" for the ill-treatment of Ghanaian travelers at Ben Gurion Airport and the "unlawful deportation" of three Ghanaian citizens.
Seven Ghanaian citizens, including four members of a parliamentary delegation attending an international cybersecurity conference in Tel Aviv, were detained for hours without cause on Sunday, with three others swiftly deported back to Ghana. Israel has not responded to Accra's move yet.
Ghana's Foreign Ministry summoned Israel's charge d'affaires, as the ambassador was abroad, to protest what it called "inhumane and traumatic treatment" of Ghanaian travelers, with both governments agreeing to pursue an amicable resolution to the dispute.
Pro-Israel narrative
Israel's airport security is strict because it must be, applying uniform procedures in a region where threats are real, not theoretical. The Ghana delegation's delay reflected standard precaution, not discrimination, and Israel apologized as soon as the facts were clear. Ghana's deportation of three Israelis was largely performative, even as Israel pressed for de-escalation and underscored that the Ghanaians held valid visas and had broken no rules.
Anti-Israel narrative
Israeli authorities deliberately targeted Ghanaian travelers at Ben Gurion Airport, subjecting them to degrading treatment, detaining seven citizens without credible justification and deporting three others. Ghana responded firmly to defend the dignity of its people. This discriminatory conduct is unacceptable and at odds with more than six decades of friendly relations, long-standing cooperation and the mutual respect both nations have publicly affirmed for years.
Bulgaria's Government Resigns Amid Mass Protests
Prime Minister Rosen Zhelyazkov announced the resignation of Bulgaria's government on Thursday, stating that "power derives from the voice of the people" and that the cabinet heard "the voice of the citizens protesting against the government."
The protests, which drew tens of thousands across Bulgaria and were estimated by media based on drone footage to exceed 100,000 people in Sofia, initially focused on the government's 2026 budget proposals but expanded to include demands for the cabinet's resignation over corruption concerns.
Delyan Peevski, a politician and oligarch whose Movement for Rights and Freedoms New Beginning party supported the minority coalition government, has been sanctioned by the U.S. and the U.K. Opponents accuse him of shaping government policy to serve oligarchic interests.
Government-critical narrative
Zhelyazkov's government completely failed the Bulgarian people by obsessing over euro adoption while ignoring urgent public needs. The administration proved itself arrogant, incompetent and corrupt, prioritizing technocratic goals over addressing the real concerns that are driving citizens into the streets. Mass protests forced this resignation because the government lost all legitimacy through its disconnection from ordinary Bulgarians.
Pro-government narrative
The Zhelyazkov government delivered historic achievements for Bulgaria's future, securing eurozone entry and full Schengen membership without a single corruption scandal in 11 months. Resignation was a strategic choice to preserve these gains, not an admission of failure. Young protesters are right to dream big and those dreams became reality precisely because Zhelyazkov succeeded where previous administrations failed for years.
Nerd narrative
There's a 50% chance that Bulgaria will adopt the euro by January 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
Supreme Court Hears Alabama Death Row IQ Threshold Case
The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) heard arguments Wednesday in Hamm v. Smith, a case involving Joseph Clifton Smith, 55, who has been on Alabama's death row for nearly half his life following his 1997 conviction for the beating death of Durk Van Dam during a robbery that netted $150, boots and tools.
Smith has taken five IQ tests as an adult, with scores ranging from 72 to 78 — all above Alabama's threshold of 70 for intellectual disability. The lower federal courts determined he met the legal definition of intellectual disability despite never scoring below 70 on any test.
Alabama law defines intellectual disability as an IQ of 70 or below with significant deficits in adaptive behavior manifesting before age 18. The state argues Smith cannot prove an IQ below 70, while Smith's attorneys note he was placed in learning-disabled classes and dropped out of school after seventh grade.
Right narrative
Smith brutally murdered a man with a hammer and now wants to escape justice by claiming low IQ scores excuse his savage crime. He scored between 72 and 78 on five separate tests, consistently above Alabama's threshold. Liberal activists are demanding holistic clinical judgment that amounts to dueling expert witnesses helping killers game the system.
Left narrative
Alabama wants to execute someone who was placed in special education as a child and who learns at a level well below his age. Multiple IQ scores falling within the margin of error for intellectual disability, combined with documented adaptive functioning deficits, clearly meet the medical standards that SCOTUS has repeatedly affirmed cannot be reduced to a single number.
Nerd narrative
There's a 50% chance that capital punishment will be legal in at least 40 U.S. States in 2035, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
Former Bolivian President Luis Arce Detained in Corruption Investigation
Authorities in Bolivia confirmed on Wednesday the arrest of the country's former president, Luis Arce, in La Paz as part of an investigation into alleged acts of embezzlement of public funds during his stint as economy minister under Evo Morales, from 2006 to 2019.
Arce is accused of authorizing millions of dollars in funds from Bolivia's so-called Indigenous Development Fund to be transferred into personal accounts of political leaders for ghost projects never built or completed.
Bolivia's Attorney General, Roger Mariaca, detailed that Arce would appear before a judge to determine whether he would remain in police custody pending trial over the alleged crimes of "breach of duty and uneconomical conduct."
Pro-government narrative
Authorities deserve praise for finally pursuing this corruption scheme and arresting Luis Arce in a case that exposes systematic enrichment of politicians at the expense of the poor. Now, investigations must extend to Evo Morales, who founded this corruption network to direct funds to his allies, along with his entire cabinet and complicit social organizations.
Government-critical narrative
Bolivia's right-wing puppet president arrested left-wing former President Luis Arce after just one month in power on bogus political charges. This is clearly part of a systematic campaign to dismantle the anti-imperialist movement by targeting its leaders. The charges are fabricated pretexts to eliminate opposition to U.S. influence in Bolivia.
Time Names 'Architects of AI' as 2025 Person of the Year
Time magazine announced on Thursday that it named the "Architects of AI" as its 2025 Person of the Year, recognizing the individuals who imagined, designed, and built the artificial intelligence technology that transformed society the most this past year, "for good or ill."
Time featured two covers for its 2025 Person of the Year issue, with one depicting eight tech leaders seated on a steel beam in homage to the 1932 "Lunch atop a Skyscraper" photograph and another showing the letters "AI" under construction surrounded by scaffolding.
The eight tech leaders featured on one Time cover include Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, Lisa Su of AMD, Elon Musk of xAI, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, Sam Altman of OpenAI, Demis Hassabis of DeepMind Technologies, Dario Amodei of Anthropic and Fei-Fei Li of Stanford and World Labs.
Pro-establishment narrative
In 2025, artificial intelligence moved from promise to reality, transforming society in every corner of daily life. The Architects of AI have delivered the age of thinking machines, accelerating scientific discovery, solving decades-old problems, creating trillions in economic value, and reshaping industries, work, and human potential. Their innovations have altered the present for better or worse — wowing and worrying humanity, and showing why understanding this moment matters more than ever.
Establishment-critical narrative
Time’s choice of AI architects as Person of the Year celebrates tech CEOs rather than the engineers and researchers who actually built the technology. These leaders have unleashed AI that disrupts creative industries, spreads misinformation, exploits intellectual property, and consumes massive energy. By elevating a marketing-friendly cast over the real creators, the magazine turns a technological revolution into a spectacle of power and profit that benefits a few while troubling everyone else.
Conservative narrative
Charlie Kirk should have been TIME’s 2025 Person of the Year. He reached and inspired millions this year, shaping debates and mobilizing young Americans in ways no insulated tech executive ever matched. By choosing AI’s corporate figureheads instead, TIME made a cowardly, crowd-pleasing pick — overlooking the human impact that actually defined 2025.
Cynical narrative
AI didn’t win Time’s Person of the Year — again — despite years of hype promising world-changing breakthroughs that always seem just one more demo away. Prediction-market true believers can rage all they want, but Time knows better than to hand the crown to a technology still struggling to deliver anything close to its mythos. Maybe someday AI will earn the title its boosters keep forecasting — but only if any of those fantastical promises ever materialize in the real world.
Nerd narrative
There is a 51% chance that there will be a positive transition to a world with radically smarter-than-human artificial intelligence, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
Thai Prime Minister Dissolves Parliament
On his Facebook page shortly after 10 p.m. local time on Thursday, Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul announced that he is "returning power to the people." A government spokesman told Reuters that the move followed a disagreement with the largest parliamentary grouping, the opposition People's Party.
According to a government source, Anutin has submitted a formal request to the King to dissolve parliament. If the King approves the dissolution request, Thailand's constitution requires that national elections be held within 45 to 60 days.
The announcement came during a joint sitting of parliament that voted on conditions for the passage of a constitutional amendment bill. The joint sitting approved a requirement that any charter amendment must secure support from at least one-third of senators.
Pro-government narrative
Dissolving Parliament now makes perfect sense, given that the prime minister has already prepared the necessary decree and simply needs to choose the optimal timing. Bhumjaithai's regular Tuesday meetings to prepare election candidates demonstrate responsible party planning, not a distraction from governance. Critics complaining about election preparations are just bitter former officials who lost their government posts and can't accept political reality.
Government-critical narrative
Rushing Parliament dissolution ahead of the promised timeline exposes the fragility of a minority government clinging to power through precarious coalition deals. This accelerated push toward elections risks deepening Thailand's political volatility during serious economic challenges — including high household debt and sluggish tourism recovery. The gamble could easily backfire and unravel the fragile consensus that barely kept this administration afloat.
Nerd narrative
There's a 35% chance that Thailand will experience a successful coup d'etat before 2040, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
Noem Faces Calls to Resign at House Hearing
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem testified before the House Committee on Homeland Security on Thursday regarding worldwide threats to the U.S. homeland, with the hearing focusing heavily on immigration enforcement operations and the Trump administration's mass deportations agenda.
During the hearing, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) called on Noem to resign, stating that she had systematically dismantled the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and violated the law. Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) announced that she requested the House Judiciary Committee to open an impeachment investigation.
When Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) also urged Noem to resign, she responded that she considers his request "an endorsement" of her work with DHS.
Republican narrative
Secretary Noem has demonstrated real leadership as head of DHS, as proven by her demanding a travel ban on countries that send dangerous migrants to the United States. Democrats were the ones caught lying during her testimony, as they falsely claimed Noem had a veteran deported. Defiant in the face of unfair criticism, Noem proved why she should stay in her position and why Trump is winning on immigration.
Democratic narrative
Noem flopped in front of Congress. She failed to answer basic questions and lied about leaving early for a FEMA meeting that was canceled. The Trump administration has been unlawfully deporting asylum seekers with active applications, turning homeland security into political retribution rather than public safety. Noem should have to face consequences, including losing her job.
Nerd narrative
There's a 50% chance that at least 869,000 immigrants to the United States will obtain lawful permanent resident status in 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.20.0