A study published in the journal Franklin Open questioned the "Infinite Monkeys Theorem," which states that an infinite number of monkeys, given infinite time, would eventually produce the complete works of Shakespeare by typing randomly on a keyboard.
The study's authors say that while the theorem is statistically possible, it doesn't account for finite time and resources, and thus is "misleading." Instead, they tested the theorem by adjusting for the timeframe when the universe will end as well as the size of the monkey population.
While the Infinite Monkeys Theorem is technically true and fun to think about, these researchers have shown that it's just a paradox. Infinite Monkeys is like other paradoxes, such as fitting an infinite amount of balls in a vase or an object covering infinite fractions of a distance never reaching its destination — they have no basis in the real world of finite time or resources.
While monkeys may not be able to re-create famous works of art, other parts of the physical world, namely computers using AI machine learning, will be able to turn randomness into coherent pieces of text even in the style of writers like Shakespeare. AI will not only be able to rewrite great literature but produce its own unique works for human consumption. Perhaps it's time to level up the original primate-cosmos paradox to account for the expanding frontiers of AI.