SCOTUS Hears Case Over Gun Ownership by Domestic Abusers

SCOTUS Hears Case Over Gun Ownership by Domestic Abusers
Image copyright: Wikimedia Commons

The Spin

Left narrative

The Bruen ruling and the appeals court ruling in favor of Rahimi are what happens when courts subscribe to unfettered originalism. There were no protective orders against domestic abusers when the Second Amendment was written. Luckily, there seems to be enough justices willing to keep the country safe.

Right narrative

The Second Amendment explicitly spells out the rare instances where it’s legal to limit gun possession. The law in question, in this case, is too broad, and the risk of mistakenly taking guns away from innocent people is too great to let the statute stand. Time and again, we find out the hard way that gun restrictions don’t impact criminals who, by their nature, don’t adhere to laws.

Metaculus Prediction


Political split

LEFT

RIGHT

More neutral political stance articles

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up!
Sign Up Now!