Thai Court Prolongs Political Deadlock, Postponing Key Vote

Image copyright: Flickr

The Spin

Narrative A

While it was surely a controversial decision, the decision not to consider Pita as a candidate for the second round of voting for premiership has a strong legal basis given that his renomination would violate Article 41 of Thailand's Regulations of the Parliamentary Assembly (2020), which states that a motion that has been rejected cannot be reintroduced unless the House Speaker allows it.

Narrative B

Given that the Constitution prevails over parliamentary rule 41, the prime ministerial selection process must be governed by sections 159 and 272 of the Constitution. Thereby, the Constitutional Court must overturn parliament's rejection of Pita's renomination as a prime ministerial candidate as it is blatantly unconstitutional.


Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up!
Sign Up Now!