Chu had planned to incite ordinary citizens to use illegal means to challenge the country's fundamental system, revive the idea of the unrest, and cause a significant risk to social order. He knew the slogans called for the separation of Hong Kong from China and the city's return to British rule. The legal system had to intervene to protect society from falling into chaos again.
Chu's conviction is a blatant attack on the right to freedom of expression and highlights the sheer malice of Hong Kong's new national security law — passed by the PRC to stifle free speech and curb dissent further. The city must reverse this sentencing and consider repealing the law that erodes freedoms and silences critics under the pretext of protecting national security.