Starmer’s House of Lords reform only scratches the surface of its problems | Simon Jenkins
GuardianOct 28
UK: Lords Debate the Removal of Hereditary Peers
Above: Members of the House of Lords take their seats in the chamber of the House of Lords at the Palace of Westminster on July 17, 2024 in London, England. Image copyright: Henry Nicholls - WPA Pool/Getty Images
The Facts
Members of the House of Lords have completed the second reading of the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill, intended to abolish the 92 seats reserved for hereditary peers in the upper chamber.
With the Salisbury Convention prohibiting the House of Lords from voting against a Government Bill that originated from an election manifesto pledge, the bill will now move forwards to committee stage.
The Spin
Left narrative
Labour's plan to remove hereditary peers from the House of Lords is a vital step in modernizing our political system. Hereditary peerages are outdated and undemocratic, and this aristocratic hangover undermines the principle of equality before the law. Removing these peers is not just about reforming the Lords, but about ensuring that UK political institutions reflect the values of modern Britain: fairness, transparency, and democracy. The time for change is long overdue and these measures should be just the start of reforming the upper chamber.
Right narrative
Hereditary peers bring a unique perspective to the House of Lords that must be protected. Unlike life peers, who are appointed for political reasons, hereditary peers are not beholden to any party or agenda. Their long-term view, shaped by inherited responsibility and paternalism, offers a counterbalance to the short-term focus of elected politicians. Removing them risks diminishing this independent voice, and undermining the diversity and depth of the legislative process. Tradition and experience still have value in modern politics.
Metaculus Prediction
Sign Up for Our Free NewslettersSign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up!
Sign Up Now!