Full list: Tory MPs prepared to vote against Rwanda Bill
Spectator (UK)Jan 29
UK: Sunak Faces Rebellion Over Rwanda Legislation
Image copyright: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images News via Getty Images
The Facts
UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak faced backlash from members of his party on Tuesday over delays plaguing controversial plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, when a total of 60 Tory MPs voted in favor of amendments proposed by Conservative Sir Bill Cash.
Two of those to rebel against the government, Lee Anderson and Brendan Clarke-Smith, announced that they were resigning from their roles as deputy chairs of the party in order to back Cash's proposed changes to the Safety of Rwanda Bill that would make it harder for migrants to appeal against deportation.
The Spin
Left narrative
Though it's absolutely right that Sunak has made addressing dangerous and illegal migration to the UK a top priority, this draconian legislation and the blundering attempts at enacting it have brought shame on the British government. This latest rebellion reaffirms that the current executive is disintegrating, even before it is inevitably thrashed by Labour in the next general election. Illegal immigration is an issue, but the UK cannot address it by usurping human rights.
Right narrative
While Tuesday's defeat was bruising, it's unlikely there will be enough rebel momentum to defeat the government in Wednesday's far more significant vote. Despite hyperbolic coverage, not much has changed regarding the bill — there are reservations across the party about it's efficacy but the conservatives are unified enough to get behind Sunak and pass the legislation. The real challenge will come when this faltering idea fails to deliver on its promises to address illegal migration — Sunak has pinned his colors to the wrong mast by whipping up emphasis on this policy.
Establishment-critical narrative
The Rwanda legislation has great potential, but will not be effective in its current form. The arguments behind proposed amendments to strengthen the legislation would address issues such as future legal challenges, and could reform the plans into a resilient deterrence against illegal migration. Britain has been considered a soft touch for too long, it is now time for Sunak to listen to the concerns of ordinary people and defend British sovereignty by supporting these amendments.