German Court Rules Birkenstock Sandals Are Not Works of Art

German Court Rules Birkenstock Sandals Are Not Works of Art
Above: Sandals are displayed at a Birkenstock store on Oct. 10, 2023, in Venice, California. Image copyright: Ethan Swope/Stringer/Getty Images News via Getty Images

The Facts

  • A German court ruled on Thursday that Birkenstocks, the sandals known for their cork and latex design, do not qualify as works of art and are thus denied the copyright protections associated with that status, rejecting a claim by the shoemakers.

  • The Federal Court of Justice wrote that works of art must display a degree of "individuality," and that "pure craftsmanship" was not sufficient to establish the shoes as artistic pieces. A lawyer for Birkenstock argued that the shoes are an "iconic design."

  • In Germany, works of art are granted copyright protection for 70 years after the death of the creator, while works of design see their protection lapse after 25 years. Many of Birkenstock's sandals debuted in the 1970s, while their creator, Karl Birkenstock, remains alive.

The Spin

Narrative A

Not only are Birkenstocks an iconic piece of art lauded by designers and made with aesthetics in mind, they are a product that deserves protection from unscrupulous copycats. Counterfeiting, especially in fashion, costs the EU tens of billions of euros and is responsible for loss of jobs. Creative industries die without effective and stringent copyright protection.

Narrative B

This was a rather cynical move from Birkenstock to seek protections merely to stifle competitors on flimsy grounds. For one, Birkenstocks are clearly utilitarian objects first and foremost, best known for their ability to mold to one's feet. This was the correct ruling, and will allow for greater competitiveness and choice for consumers.

Articles on this story

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up!
Sign Up Now!