Unlike Netanyahu, Halevi is taking responsibility for the security failures that led to Hamas' Oct. 7 attack. Though extremists in the Israeli government have criticized Halevi on many occasions and Netanyahu has tried to shift the blame onto him and the security establishment, he was an honest and hardworking military leader. Netanyahu should follow Halevi's initiative and resign.
Though Halevi presided over Israel's worst security failure in 50 years, he was an honorable military chief who cares deeply about Israel's security. Nonetheless, the time has come for a new kind of military that refuses to accept partial victories and discards excessive consideration for the enemy. Halevi at times showed weakness, especially when it came to controlling the aid that entered Gaza. Unlike the past, Israel's military must act as an attack dog to ensure the country's security.
Halevi oversaw the security failures that led to Oct. 7 and the brutal campaign of revenge in Gaza. Ironically, Halevi's primary detractors are right-wing fanatics who believe that he was not brutal enough. Either way, whoever takes Halevi's role will be just as bad, if not worse, for Palestinians as Netanyahu works to break the cease-fire.