Minister attacks expenses rules after Labour MP’s claim for ‘pet rent’
Guardian5 days
UK: MP's £900 for Dog's 'Pet Rent' Prompts Expenses Review
Above: People stroll over Westminster Bridge next to the Houses of Parliament and Big Ben in London, UK, on June 2, 2022. Image copyright: Andy Soloman/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
The Spin
Pro-establishment narrative
MPs are required to work in multiple locations, often necessitating second homes or additional living arrangements. In Owatemi's case, expensing dog rent falls within the rules set by the parliamentary watchdog aimed to ensure MPs can fulfill their duties effectively. While concerns about the appropriateness of this expense are valid, the government is already working with IPSA to review and address the issue fairly.
Establishment-critical narrative
It’s outrageous that MPs like Owatemi are expensing pet rent to taxpayers. Amid hard-hitting welfare cuts by the government, its politicians earning nearly £94,000 a year should not rely on public funds to cover their personal lifestyle choices like owning a dog. This practice reflects a tone-deaf sense of entitlement, especially when ordinary citizens face economic hardship. MPs should pay for their pets themselves.