Is Jonathan Powell scared of scrutiny?
Spectator (UK)7 days ago
UK: Government Rejects National Security Advisor Committee Appearance
Above: Jonathan Powell makes a speech during the "Recent Developments in the Middle East and the Imminent Danger" panel within TRT World Forum in Istanbul, Turkey on Oct. 18, 2017. Image copyright: Emrah Yorulmaz/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images via Getty Images
The Facts
UK National Security Advisor Jonathan Powell has declined three separate invitations to appear before the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy (JCNSS), breaking with the precedent set by all previous holders of this position since it was established in 2010.
The government, through Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden, justified Powell's refusal by citing "longstanding practice" that special advisers do not give evidence to select committees, offering instead to send deputy national security advisers and the Cabinet Secretary as alternatives.
Committee Chair Matt Western emphasized that Powell is not an ordinary special adviser, citing his executive function and independent status, including his role in international diplomacy and meetings with US counterparts.
The Spin
Pro-establishment narrative
The government must maintain longstanding conventions regarding special advisers and protect private cabinet discussions. Powell's role as a special adviser means he should not give public evidence to committees, though he remains willing to meet privately. The established practice of ministerial accountability through official channels must be preserved.
Establishment-critical narrative
Parliamentary oversight of national security is being stifled by unprecedented restrictions. The government's position contradicts its own rules and previous practices, setting a dangerous precedent for avoiding public scrutiny on crucial security matters. The committee's ability to assess national security progress is being deliberately hampered.