This case epitomizes the fraudulent nature of groups like the Innocence Project, which champion controversial cases over obvious wrongful convictions. By portraying criminals as victims of society, it conflates fairness with defending the indefensible, eroding confidence in reform and misrepresenting its mission. Thanks to this professional activism, a real murderer was let loose and even given $4M of taxpayer money.
While groups like the Innocence Project aren't right 100% of the time, the US justice system isn't either, which is why wrongful conviction cases are necessary. In America, where false confessions, misconduct, and faulty evidence often lead to wrongful convictions, legal activist groups work to uphold fairness, prevent future errors, and strengthen public confidence in the legal system. This isn't a zero-sum debate.