Elon Musk's latest money making idea for X? Selling old Twitter handles for $50,000 a pop, report says.
Business InsiderNov 13, 2023
SCOTUS Denies Hearing X's First Amendment Case
Image copyright: Matt Cardy/Getty Images News via Getty Images
The Facts
The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Monday declined to hear X's (formerly Twitter's) appeal of a lower court ruling against disclosing government data requests. X had argued that it was "critical" that SCOTUS take the case to establish standards for when and how tech companies can speak about government requests to surveil user data.
The company, then Twitter, began its first legal action on the issue in 2014, a year after Edward Snowden leaked details about the US government's secret telecom surveillance. The government then ruled that companies could report demands from agencies like the FBI, but only in wide ranges rather than exact numbers.
The Spin
Pro-establishment narrative
There is nothing more to be said following previous court rulings. Agencies such as the FBI have deemed certain data requests classified because their disclosure would jeopardize national security. The fact that there are documents even X wasn't allowed to see as a plaintiff shows how sensitive they were. The government doesn't take such action lightly, but when they do, companies need to understand the gravity of government data requests.
Establishment-critical narrative
X has been trying to combat government secrecy and data breaches since before it was called X. Unfortunately, for the 69% of requests it complied with, X was mandated by federal law. However, when the US government previously asked to wiretap Twitter users, the company declined, citing violation of the law. The US FBI, DOJ, and Secret Service make up a disproportionate amount of global government data requests — this is a violation of free speech, and authoritarian surveillance, that X will continue to fight.