US judge Tanya Chutkan on Tuesday rejected a request from 14 Democratic-led states' to halt DOGE and Elon Musk from accessing federal agency data and laying off personnel, saying they failed to prove immediate irreparable harm.
The lawsuit targeted DOGE's operations in seven federal agencies: the Office of Personnel Management, and the Departments of Education, Labor, Health and Human Services, Energy, Transportation, and Commerce.
Judge Chutkan did however express concern about the "unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight," suggesting potential constitutional issues.
The efficiency drive represents necessary reform to eliminate government waste and fulfill voter mandates. DOGE's rapid action and access to agency data is essential for identifying and eliminating billions in unnecessary spending, with agency heads maintaining ultimate decision-making authority.
DOGE's operations constitute an unconstitutional power grab, allowing an unelected private citizen to wield unprecedented authority over federal agencies without proper oversight or accountability, potentially compromising sensitive government data and disrupting essential services.