Trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelensky in the works
New York Post22 hrs
Zelenskyy Outlines Peace Demands Ahead of White House Visit
Above: Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Chancellery on Aug. 13, 2025, in Berlin, Germany. Image copyright: Omer Messinger/Getty Images
The Spin
Pro-Trump narrative
Trump's diplomatic engagement with Putin is a pragmatic approach to ending a devastating conflict that has killed over a million people. The Alaska summit achieved meaningful progress by establishing direct dialogue between nuclear powers and moving beyond ineffective ceasefire proposals toward comprehensive peace agreements. This breakthrough diplomacy offers the best chance for a sustainable resolution.
Anti-Trump narrative
The Trump-Putin meeting wasn't diplomacy — it was just theater, which only legitimized Putin's actions. The summit yielded no substantive outcomes, with no concrete agreements reached, and failed to address Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the red-carpet reception, the summit was unable to pressure Russia into meaningful concessions, undermining U.S. credibility and raising concerns about appeasement.
Pro-Russia narrative
Putin emerged decisively victorious from the Alaska meeting, as the summit firmly validated Moscow's role as a key global power, outmaneuvering Western adversaries. By demanding that all root causes of hostilities be addressed, Putin emphasized a fair and balanced approach, positioning Russia as a responsible leader committed to lasting peace and stability on the world stage.
Pro-Ukraine narrative
Ukraine will not agree to any territory swap with Russia and will steadfastly uphold constitutional integrity and sovereignty. If a trilateral meeting fails to materialize — or if Russia evades a genuine end to the war — sanctions must be strengthened to ensure accountability and a just peace. Pressure on Russia must continue until the aggression and occupation cease.