Hasan Piker's claims of political targeting by U.S. immigration officials are completely unfounded. His detention at Chicago's airport was a standard, lawful procedure that happens daily to various travelers. Piker, known for his inflammatory rhetoric, tries to portray this as an attack on his free speech. In reality, the inspection followed routine protocols, and once completed, Piker was promptly released — nothing more than a typical border security measure.
Piker wasn't randomly stopped at the border — CBP knew precisely who he was. Under Trump's second term, this kind of political targeting is becoming more and more common, especially for critics of U.S. policy on Gaza and Israel. Piker was held and questioned for hours about his views, interviews, and whether he supported groups like Hamas — all protected First Amendment activity. This isn't about security. It's a clear attempt to indirectly silence dissent.
Given Hasan Piker's past support for terrorist groups like Hamas and his notorious comments, including that "America deserved 9/11," it's no surprise he would be questioned by border security. His history of glorifying violence and terror should raise legitimate concerns. Border agents are responsible for ensuring national security, especially when dealing with individuals publicly expressing dangerous ideologies.