20 January 2026

Daily Newsletter

Trump Threatens 200% Tariff on French Wine Over Gaza Peace Board

The Facts

  • U.S. President Donald Trump proposed a "200% tariff" on French wine and champagne on Monday after reports claimed French President Emmanuel Macron would not join his proposed "Board of Peace." Trump said the tariff would follow if France took a "hostile" stance, adding that Macron was not required to participate.

  • The Board of Peace was initially proposed to oversee Gaza’s reconstruction, with a draft charter sent to approximately 60 countries requiring members to contribute $1 billion for membership beyond three years.

  • France indicated that it does not intend to "give a favorable response" to the Board of Peace invitation, with a source close to Macron stating the charter goes beyond Gaza's framework and raises questions about "respect for the principles and structure of the United Nations."


The Spin

Pro-Trump narrative

President Trump’s 200% tariff threat on French wine follows Paris’s refusal to join the proposed Board of Peace, exposing Europe’s preference for moral rhetoric without responsibility. The move is leverage designed to force engagement on trade imbalances and security burden-sharing. By linking market access to diplomatic participation, Trump is replacing empty multilateralism with power-based negotiation and clear costs.

Pro-Europe narrative

Trump’s tariff threats amount to economic coercion that steadily erodes transatlantic trust and flouts established international norms. Weaponizing trade to extract political compliance weakens long-standing alliances and injects volatility into global markets. France’s resistance reflects a wider European imperative to defend strategic sovereignty, making the EU’s anti-coercion instrument a justified and necessary response to an increasingly unpredictable partner.

Nerd narrative

There is a 4% chance that Emmanuel Macron will cease being President of France before 2027, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

18M Yemenis Face Worsening Hunger Crisis in 2026

The Facts

  • More than 18 million people are projected to face worsening food insecurity in Yemen in early 2026, with over 40,000 people expected to experience famine-like conditions in four districts within two months, marking the worst outlook since 2022.

  • Yemen's humanitarian response plan received less than 25% of required funding by the end of 2025, the lowest level in a decade, while nutrition programs received under 10% of the resources needed.

  • The United Nations warned that approximately 21 million Yemenis will need humanitarian assistance in 2026, an increase from 19.5 million in 2025, as the country faces economic collapse and disrupted essential services.


The Spin

Pro-establishment narrative

Yemen's humanitarian catastrophe has been exacerbated by Houthi terrorism and Iranian interference, which have sabotaged peace efforts and weakened state institutions. The Houthis are the primary enemy, undermining governance and deepening the crisis through reported arbitrary detention of U.N. personnel and alleged blocking of aid delivery to millions. Any peace process that does not address the Houthi coup and efforts to disarm these militias risks prolonging suffering and regional instability.

Establishment-critical narrative

Catastrophic funding cuts by Western donors have reversed a decade of humanitarian progress and pushed 18 million Yemenis toward starvation. International neglect and slashed aid budgets have forced the closure of nutrition programs and health facilities, leaving families to collect wild plants just to survive. The crisis isn't inevitable — immediate donor action and restored funding can prevent widespread famine before mortality rates spike.

Nerd narrative

There is a 50% chance that the ceasefire between the U.S. and Yemen’s Houthis mediated by Oman will be broken before June 2026, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Trump Describes UK Chagos Island Deal as 'Great Stupidity' Amid Greenland Dispute

The Facts

  • U.S. President Donald Trump accused the U.K. of "an act of great stupidity" in returning sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to the Mauritius via a Truth Social post in the early hours of Tuesday. He added that it was "another in a very long line of National Security reasons why Greenland has to be acquired."

  • When the Chagos deal was signed in May last year, which included provisions allowing the U.K. to lease the largest island of Diego Garcia — home to a U.K.-U.S. military base — for 99 years, it was welcomed by the Trump administration, with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio "commend[ing] both the United Kingdom and Mauritius."

  • In February 2025, Trump directly stated he was "inclined" to agree with the deal. The latest comments come after U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer called for "calm discussion" with the U.S. over the fate of Greenland on Monday, describing Trump's threat of tariffs to acquire the territory as "completely wrong."


The Spin

Pro-Trump narrative

The U.K.'s handing over of Diego Garcia to Mauritius was a foolish decision, no doubt seen by countries like China and Russia as a sign of total weakness. Britain's sorry saga is clear evidence of why the U.S. must act from a position of strength and acquire Greenland to ensure that America's national security is secured.

Left narrative

The long-awaited deal on the Chagos Islands was reached because a number of international court decisions ruled that Britain's presence on the island was contrary to law. The absence of a deal would have restricted the base's operational effectiveness, and by securing an agreement — which was welcomed by all Five Eyes allies, including the U.S. — the U.K. has been able to legally guarantee its presence there for generations to come.

Right narrative

President Trump is right that the decision to throw away the Chagos Islands was an act of stupidity and self-sabotage. Though the needless degradation of Britain's security is no justification for an unlawful seizure of Greenland, Trump's intervention does give Starmer the chance to finally change course over Chagos before it is too late.

See sources

North Korea's Kim Jong Un Publicly Fires Vice Premier

The Facts

  • North Korean leader Kim Jong Un dismissed Vice Premier Yang Sung Ho during a speech at the Ryongsong Machine Complex on Monday. According to the Korean Central News Agency, Kim blamed Yang for causing "unnecessary man-made confusion" in the factory's modernization project.

  • Kim criticized Yang for irresponsibility and incompetence, stating that the project suffered economic losses. He compared the vice premier to a "goat" yoked to an ox cart, calling his appointment "an accidental personnel mistake."

  • Kim also said he had criticized Yang at a party meeting in December and monitored his conduct subsequently, but found Yang "felt no sense of responsibility at all," leading to the on-the-spot dismissal at Monday's event.


The Spin

Anti-North Korea narrative

North Korean officials face crushing pressure to meet impossible economic targets while being blamed for ideological failures rather than receiving practical support. Authorities demand higher quotas without addressing supply shortages, trade restrictions or damaged business relationships that make success unattainable. This political scapegoating creates severe psychological stress as officials are held personally responsible for systemic problems beyond their control.

Pro-North Korea narrative

Dismissing incompetent officials who waste resources and make excuses shows necessary accountability for economic modernization. The vice premier's removal demonstrates that defeatism and irresponsibility will no longer be tolerated when critical industrial projects suffer from preventable human errors. Breaking from reliance on passive bureaucrats creates the fresh start needed for genuine innovation and growth.

Nerd narrative

There's a 50% chance that Kim Jong Un will no longer be the leader of North Korea in April 2044, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

UK Approves Chinese 'Mega Embassy' in London

The Facts

  • The U.K. government approved plans for a new Chinese embassy in east London on Tuesday. The decision, announced in a 240-page document, came amid opposition from local residents in the area, as well as criticism that the site could leave the U.K. vulnerable to surveillance and espionage risks.

  • Disputes about the so-called "mega embassy" date back to 2018 when the People's Republic of China bought the 20,000-square-foot site at Royal Mint Court near the Tower of London for £255 million ($342.9 million). Since then, the local Tower Hamlets council has twice rejected plans to convert the plot — first in December 2022 and then in December 2024.

  • A planning application was then resubmitted in July 2024, soon after Labour's election victory, with Chinese Premier Xi Jinping urging U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to personally intervene in their first call a month later. Labour then took the decision out of the hands of the local council.


The Spin

Pro-government narrative

Having consulted widely with the Home and Foreign Office, as well as several branches of Britain's intelligence community, it is clear that any alleged risks presented by the Chinese embassy can be reasonably managed and mitigated. This decision has been approved following a robust review — respecting diplomatic relations while maintaining Britain's national security.

Government-critical narrative

The embassy's approval is a disgraceful act of cowardice from a Labour government and prime minister devoid of backbone. The first duty of any government is to keep the country safe, but Starmer seems more concerned about getting Beijing's approval. He cannot be trusted to lead Britain on the world stage.

Pro-China narrative

The approval of the long-awaited embassy plans is a welcome consolidation of U.K.-China relations. For years, Beijing has faced continued slander despite its continued and open intention to only develop positive relations with Britain. Today's decision shows that, despite the swathes of misinformation, these two nations can continue to forge a stable and prosperous future.

Nerd narrative

There is a 21% that the U.K. will have a Conservative Prime Minister at the beginning of 2030, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Report: Powell to Attend Supreme Court Hearing on Cook Removal

The Facts

  • Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell reportedly plans to attend U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) oral arguments Wednesday regarding President Donald Trump's attempt to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook from her position. Trump moved to fire Cook in August following allegations of mortgage fraud raised by a senior administration official.

  • SCOTUS has allowed Cook to remain in her role on the Fed Board while it considers the case. Cook has denied allegations of mortgage fraud related to bank documents for two properties in Atlanta and Ann Arbor, Mich., and has not been charged with any criminal offenses.

  • Powell's planned attendance follows his recent announcement that the Justice Department (DOJ) served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas earlier this month. The subpoenas focus on a $2.5 billion renovation of Fed buildings and Powell's June testimony to the Senate Banking Committee about the project.


The Spin

Pro-Trump narrative

Powell attending the hearing would be a blatant attempt to politicize the Federal Reserve and influence judicial proceedings. The Fed chair sitting in court trying to put his thumb on the scale undermines the central bank's credibility and independence. This appearance would transform what should be an impartial institution into a political actor.

Anti-Trump narrative

Powell has every right to attend as a co-defendant in a case directly affecting the Fed's institutional integrity. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent himself — who has been vocal in his opposition — sat front row at SCOTUS tariff arguments despite not being a defendant, making his criticism rank hypocrisy. Past Fed chairs have attended court proceedings, establishing clear precedent for Powell's presence.

Nerd narrative

There's a 47.3% chance that Trump will nominate Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal to $72B All-Cash Offer

The Facts

  • Netflix announced on Tuesday that it amended its agreement to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery's studios and HBO Max streaming business to an all-cash offer valued at $27.75 per share, maintaining the overall $72 billion equity value of the deal.

  • The revised all-cash structure eliminates the stock component from Netflix's original bid and is expected to enable Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders to vote on the proposed transaction by April 2026, accelerating the timeline from the previously anticipated spring or early summer vote.

  • Warner Bros. Discovery stockholders will receive $27.75 per share in cash, plus additional value in the form of shares in Discovery Global, which will be spun off as a separate publicly traded company, including networks such as CNN, TNT and the Discovery Channel.


The Spin

Narrative A

Netflix's latest offer is a superior deal that provides shareholders with greater financial certainty and an accelerated timeline. The revised structure eliminates market-based variability while maintaining the transaction value, demonstrating Netflix's commitment to completing this pro-consumer, pro-innovation combination. This merger will unite two premier storytelling companies and deliver broader choice and greater value to audiences worldwide.

Narrative B

This merger threatens to create a dangerous media monopoly that would give Netflix control over more than a quarter of the U.S. media market. Concentrating oversight of major newsrooms like CNN under one owner with potential political ties undermines media independence and diversity. The deal deserves heavy regulatory skepticism given the unprecedented market power it would grant to a single streaming giant.

Nerd narrative

There's a 78% chance that at least 10 of the 20 highest grossing new movies in the year 2050 will be remakes of previous movies or continuations of previous movie franchises, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Israel Demolishes UNRWA Compound in East Jerusalem

The Facts

  • Israeli demolition teams, accompanied by police and officials, used heavy machinery to begin tearing down the headquarters of the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) at Ammunition Hill in East Jerusalem on Tuesday.

  • According to Israel Land Authority, planning and development initiatives for the 46,000-square-meter (495,000-square-foot) site that contains a historic structure marked for preservation include the building of about 1,400 housing units.

  • This comes as the Israeli parliament Knesset passed legislation in October 2024 banning UNRWA from operating in Israel and Israeli officials from having contact with the agency, prompting the closure of UNRWA offices in Jerusalem last January as Israel considers all of the city as part of its territory.


The Spin

Government-critical narrative

The demolition of the UNRWA headquarters in Jerusalem is an unprecedented assault on international law and U.N. immunity that threatens the entire global order and sets a dangerous precedent where any international organization or diplomatic mission could face similar treatment tomorrow. Israel is carrying out a coordinated campaign to erase Palestinian Refugee identity in direct defiance of the International Court of Justice.

Pro-government narrative

UNRWA has transformed from a humanitarian agency into a terror-supporting institution that perpetuates conflict by keeping Palestinians in permanent refugee status rather than resettling them. Moreover, the agency has employed Hamas operatives as educators, ignored evidence of 100+ employees linked to terrorism and the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre. Lasting peace requires resettlement and integration, not maintaining the destructive illusion of mass return.

See sources

Austrian Cow Becomes First Documented to Use Tools

The Facts

  • Veronika, a 13-year-old Swiss Brown cow living in Austria, has been documented as the first cow to use tools, according to researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. She manipulates a deck brush with her tongue and teeth to scratch hard-to-reach areas of her body.

  • The cow uses different ends of the broom for different purposes, applying the bristled end to thick-skinned areas like her back and the smooth handle to softer regions such as her udder and belly. This multipurpose tool use has previously been documented consistently only in chimpanzees.

  • Researchers Alice Auersperg and Antonio Osuna-Mascar conducted 70 trials over multiple days, placing a deck brush on the ground in random orientations. They recorded 76 instances of Veronika using the tool to scratch herself, demonstrating consistent and goal-directed behavior.


The Spin

Narrative A

Cattle have been grossly underestimated and dismissed as unintelligent when the real problem is that factory farming denies them the opportunity to develop their cognitive abilities. Veronika's tool use proves cows possess sophisticated intelligence that emerges when given enriching environments and long lifespans instead of industrial confinement. The absurdity isn't a cow using tools — it's humans never recognizing bovine intelligence despite living alongside cattle for thousands of years.

Narrative B

Veronika isn't a "gifted" cow — her abilities developed from specific circumstances like living freely, never being milked and losing her mother's touch. The cow's tool use emerged from practical need to relieve horsefly bites, not some revelation about cattle intelligence. Despite millennia of domestication, cattle remain excluded from animal intelligence discussions for good reason.

Nerd narrative

There's a 50% chance that the milk of cows whose DNA is intentionally altered to be hornless will be for sale in the United States by December 2032, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources


© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 6.20.3

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 6.20.3