The Attempted Trump Assassination, July 13, 2024
Overview
On July 13, 2024, former US Pres. Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
The shooter, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, positioned himself on a rooftop 400 feet from the stage, using an AR-15 style rifle originally legally purchased by his father.
Trump sustained a minor injury when a bullet grazed his right ear, causing bleeding. He briefly stood to reassure the crowd before being evacuated for treatment at a local hospital.
The Spin
Republican narrative
The attack on Donald Trump underscores the escalating threat of political violence against and a broader climate of hostility toward conservative voices, compounded by media bias and insufficient condemnation from opposition leaders. It exposes significant security shortcomings and a troubling readiness by some to use violence, signaling a concerning erosion of civil discourse in America.
Democratic narrative
The violence against Donald Trump is a tragic consequence of an increasingly dangerous political climate, fuelled by extreme rhetoric from Trump and other Republican leaders. While violence must be condemned, it is essential to recognize how divisive language has intensified hostilities. Addressing political aggression requires holding leaders accountable who prioritize division over dialogue. Reviewing security measures is necessary, but so is curbing rhetoric that undermines democratic values.
Establishment-critical narrative
There were too many coincidences in this incident. Local police were alerted to the suspect long before Trump went on the stage, they saw him on the roof and didn’t engage, and Crooks managed to get off eight shots before being stopped. The timing and circumstances raise serious questions about who really orchestrated this attempted assassination.
Event
On July 13, 2024, during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, former US Pres. Donald Trump was the target of an assassination attempt by Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania.
Positioned on a rooftop approximately 400 feet from the stage, outside the event's designated security perimeter, Crooks used an AR-15-style rifle purchased by his father to fire up to eight shots in rapid succession beginning around 6:11 pm. Initially aiming his rifle at a law enforcement officer who had attempted to investigate reports of a suspicious person, he then shifted his aim toward the stage, hitting Trump with a bullet that grazed his right ear, causing visible bleeding and a minor injury. Trump's movement at the critical moment, turning to look at a screen and leaning into the microphone, is speculated to have saved his life.
The gunfire resulted in the death of Corey Comperatore, a rally attendee and former volunteer fire chief, and critical injuries to two other attendees, David Dutch and James Copenhaver, who were treated at Allegheny General Hospital. The US Secret Service responded within 30 seconds of the first shot, neutralizing Crooks with a sniper and evacuating Trump from the scene. Despite his injury, Trump briefly signaled reassurance to the crowd with a fist pump and mouthing “fight, fight, fight” before being fully evacuated.
Trump was immediately transported to Butler Memorial Hospital, where he underwent a CT scan and medical evaluation. The examination revealed a 2 cm wide wound on his right ear that did not require sutures. Despite intermittent bleeding, Trump was discharged the same day, with his safety confirmed by his spokesperson by 6:51 pm.
Security were aware of Crooks before the shooting
Sources:
The Spin
Republican narrative
The attack on Donald Trump underscores the escalating threat of political violence against and a broader climate of hostility toward conservative voices, compounded by media bias and insufficient condemnation from opposition leaders. It exposes significant security shortcomings and a troubling readiness by some to use violence, signaling a concerning erosion of civil discourse in America.
Democratic narrative
The violence against Donald Trump is a tragic consequence of an increasingly dangerous political climate, fuelled by extreme rhetoric from Trump and other Republican leaders. While violence must be condemned, it is essential to recognize how divisive language has intensified hostilities. Addressing political aggression requires holding leaders accountable who prioritize division over dialogue. Reviewing security measures is necessary, but so is curbing rhetoric that undermines democratic values.
Establishment-critical narrative
There were too many coincidences in this incident. Local police were alerted to the suspect long before Trump went on the stage, they saw him on the roof and didn’t engage, and Crooks managed to get off eight shots before being stopped. The timing and circumstances raise serious questions about who really orchestrated this attempted assassination.
Timeline
6:05 pm EDT - Donald Trump takes the stage at the Butler Farm Show Grounds for his campaign rally.
6:08 pm – Thomas Matthew Crooks is seen near a rooftop outside the security perimeter by local law enforcement, but no immediate action is taken.
6:11 pm – Crooks opens fire from an unsecured rooftop roughly 400 feet away from Trump’s position. He fires eight shots in two bursts, hitting Trump in the right ear and causing minor injuries. One attendee, Corey Comperatore, is killed while shielding his family, and two others are critically injured.
6:12 pm – Secret Service agents respond and fatally shoot Crooks. Trump is quickly escorted off the stage by Secret Service personnel.
6:15 pm – Emergency services arrive to tend to the wounded, and Trump is transported to Butler Memorial Hospital for evaluation.
6:45 pm – The rally site is secured, and an initial investigation is launched.
Later that evening – Trump is released from the hospital and returns to his campaign, later appearing at the Republican National Convention with a bandage over his right ear.
Sources:
The Spin
Republican narrative
The attack on Donald Trump underscores the escalating threat of political violence against and a broader climate of hostility toward conservative voices, compounded by media bias and insufficient condemnation from opposition leaders. It exposes significant security shortcomings and a troubling readiness by some to use violence, signaling a concerning erosion of civil discourse in America.
Democratic narrative
The violence against Donald Trump is a tragic consequence of an increasingly dangerous political climate, fuelled by extreme rhetoric from Trump and other Republican leaders. While violence must be condemned, it is essential to recognize how divisive language has intensified hostilities. Addressing political aggression requires holding leaders accountable who prioritize division over dialogue. Reviewing security measures is necessary, but so is curbing rhetoric that undermines democratic values.
Establishment-critical narrative
There were too many coincidences in this incident. Local police were alerted to the suspect long before Trump went on the stage, they saw him on the roof and didn’t engage, and Crooks managed to get off eight shots before being stopped. The timing and circumstances raise serious questions about who really orchestrated this attempted assassination.
Shooter
Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, was born and raised in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. He graduated from Bethel Park High School in 2022 and earned an associate’s degree in engineering science from the Community College of Allegheny County.
At the time of the incident, Crooks reportedly worked as a dietary aide at a nursing home. Initial reports, particularly on social media, mistakenly identified him as various unrelated figures, including 30-year-old anti-Trump protester Maxwell Yearick.
It has been reported that Crooks had a history of being bullied during his school years, often sitting alone at lunch and facing mockery for his choice of clothing, such as hunting outfits, but the school denies this. Described by acquaintances as intelligent but quiet, Crooks earned a $500 “star award” for his achievements in math and science from the National Math and Science Initiative in his senior year. Former classmates also said he tried out for the high school’s rifle team but was turned away due to poor shooting skills. The school claimed to have no record of any such tryout.
Crooks was registered as a Republican in Pennsylvania, which holds closed primary elections, but in 2021 he made a $15 donation to ActBlue, a political action committee supporting Democratic and left-leaning causes. The FBI, treating the incident as a potential act of domestic terrorism, has not yet identified a clear motive. Searches of Crooks’ phone and computer have not revealed any specific ideological stance behind the incident.
Crook's parents reportedly called the police hours before the shooting to report him missing, saying they were concerned about his welfare.
Sources:
The Spin
Democratic narrative
Thomas Matthew Crooks was a troubled young man with a history of concerning behavior, including school shooting plans and extreme views, according to his peers. He was a loner and bullied at school. His parents reporting him missing shows they saw warning signs. This was a disturbed individual who needed mental health intervention.
Republican narrative
Crooks was a strategic actor who meticulously prepared for his actions. His Republican registration, contrasted with a donation to ActBlue, was likely an effort to mislead others about his political leanings. The presence of explosives and weapons points to a carefully planned act.
Establishment-critical narrative
The sophisticated equipment and bomb-making materials point to this being more than just a lone shooter. The combination of surveillance tech and professional planning, along with the nearly completely opaque nature of the investigation, suggest backing from powerful interests trying to eliminate political threats. There are concerning historical parallels between this and other successful and attempted assassinations of political figures, including John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon.
Security Lapses
The assassination attempt on Donald Trump exposed critical vulnerabilities in security protocols designed to protect high-profile figures.
Multiple lapses allowed Thomas Crooks to breach defenses and position himself for the attack. Crooks used a drone for reconnaissance, taking advantage of a delayed deployment of the Secret Service’s drone-detection system, which left the airspace around the venue unsecured and allowed him to map the area without detection.
Crooks gained access to a rooftop overlooking the stage, highlighting deficiencies in both pre-event security assessments and active monitoring. Despite multiple security checkpoints, he managed to carry an AR-15-style rifle, explosives, and reconnaissance equipment to this location, pointing to gaps in the screening process.
Due to personnel shortages, the rooftop was left unguarded, leaving an unobstructed line of sight to the stage. While police snipers were stationed inside the building, no personnel were assigned to cover the rooftop area, with Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle pointing to safety concerns with the sloped roofs. Additionally, requests for added security were reportedly denied.
Communication failures further complicated the response. Local snipers observed Crooks’ suspicious behavior for over an hour but did not relay their observations to the Secret Service. Key details about his position were not shared through the Secret Service radio network, preventing timely intervention.
Moreover, coordination challenges among the 155 law enforcement personnel—including Secret Service agents and SWAT teams—left several coverage gaps, and reports from eyewitnesses of suspicious activity went unaddressed.
In the days leading up to the incident, Crooks purchased over 50 rounds of ammunition and a ladder — activities that went unnoticed. Just hours before the event, Crooks’ parents reported him missing and voiced concerns, raising further questions about missed warning signs.
Sources:
The Spin
Democratic narrative
The assassination attempt was a result of preventable mistakes and negligence. The delay in deploying drone detection allowed Thomas Crooks to easily gather intelligence, a failure that should have been anticipated. Letting him access a rooftop with a rifle exposed critical flaws in screening. Communication breakdowns and poor coordination among agencies only made matters worse. With better planning and a more proactive approach, this breach could and should have been prevented.
Republican narrative
The near-assassination of Trump resulted from flawed diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies within the Secret Service. Director Kimberly Cheatle’s focus on diversity quotas led to hiring personnel less qualified for critical roles. A high number of women on Trump’s protective detail appeared unprepared, revealing gaps in training and competence. By prioritizing diversity over merit, these failures created vulnerabilities that could have been avoided with a more common sense security approach.
Narrative C
The incident revealed just how difficult it is to secure high-profile events. The unexpected use of a drone pushed surveillance systems to their limits, showing that not every threat can be anticipated. Limited personnel meant that securing every potential risk, like the rooftop, was nearly impossible. In such a fast-moving situation, communication and coordination between agencies are naturally challenging. It’s a stark reminder that even with thorough preparation, some risks are simply unavoidable.
Establishment-critical narrative
The Secret Service deliberately undermined Trump's safety by denying his legitimate requests for additional security and ignoring multiple warnings about the shooter. This represents a systematic failure to protect a former president who had specifically requested enhanced protection, and raises serious questions as to why Trump was not adequately protected.
Public and Political Reactions
Following the assassination attempt on Trump, a range of political responses emerged.
World leaders condemned the attack. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French Pres. Emmanuel Macron, Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz denounced the attack as a threat to democracy. China’s Xi Jinping, Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, and Japan’s Fumio Kishida expressed concern. Russia blamed the Biden administration for fostering a divisive atmosphere but said they did not believe that the US government was behind the attack. Iran rejected claims of involvement after reports that US officials had recently warned of a possible threat against Trump.
In the US, Pres. Joe Biden condemned the attack, calling for unity and a reduction in political tensions, and ordered a security review. He faced criticism for previously referring to Trump as a “bullseye,” with Republicans accusing him of contributing to a hostile political climate. Biden later clarified that he meant it in a political context, not as incitement. Republican leaders, including Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, demanded accountability for security failures. Some conservative figures attributed the attack to escalating political rhetoric, while others called for increased protections for political candidates.
On social media, speculation spread rapidly. Some blamed Democratic rhetoric for fostering violence, while others suggested the attack was staged to boost Trump’s campaign. Debates also emerged over security failures and the adequacy of protections for high-profile political figures.
Sources:
The Spin
Democratic narrative
Political violence is never justified, and the attack on Trump is deeply troubling. But his rhetoric has fueled a climate where such acts feel inevitable. He has framed opponents as enemies, defended Jan. 6 rioters, and pushed election fraud claims that stoke fear and division. Now, he blames Democrats while ignoring his own role in escalating tensions. Calling him a threat to democracy isn’t incitement — it’s a response to his actions. He set the stage for violence.
Republican narrative
Democrats and the media have spent years comparing Trump to Hitler and calling his reelection a threat to democracy, creating a climate where violence feels justified. Biden and others labeled him a danger to the republic, while legal battles and impeachment efforts cast him as illegitimate. Now, after years of demonization, an attack has occurred. Despite blaming rhetoric for violence, Democrats ignore their own role. Holding Trump responsible while absolving themselves is hypocrisy.
Establishment-critical narrative
Both parties have fueled America’s rising political violence. Republicans spread conspiracy theories and grievance politics, while Democrats frame Trump and his supporters as existential threats, making violence seem justified to some. Each side escalates rhetoric while denying responsibility, using fear to mobilize voters. As long as leaders exploit division for political gain, the cycle of violence will only worsen.
FBI Investigation
Following the assassination attempt, the FBI, Secret Service, and Pennsylvania State Police initiated a comprehensive investigation, classifying the incident as an act of domestic terrorism.
Forensic teams collected evidence at the scene, focusing on the AR-15-style rifle used and surveillance footage of Crooks' movements prior to the incident.
Items recovered from Crooks car included a bulletproof vest, loaded magazines, and remote-controlled explosive devices. An additional search of his home uncovered another bulletproof vest, another remote-controlled explosive device and a 3D printer.
Records indicated that Crooks had practiced shooting the day before the incident and purchased ammunition on the day of the attack. The investigation expanded to include Crooks' cellphone and computer, and over 100 interviews were conducted to collect information and eyewitness accounts, including from Trump himself.
Crooks' digital activity showed searches related to political figures and historical assassinations, including “How far away was Oswald from Kennedy?”Authorities issued a public appeal for any additional information or video footage.
A bipartisan House task force consisting of seven Republicans and six Democrats was established to investigate the security lapses and scrutinize the Secret Service's actions to identify areas needing improvement.
Further to these efforts, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas appointed a bipartisan panel to conduct a thorough examination of security protocols.
Additionally, President Joe Biden ordered an independent review of the incident to ensure a comprehensive assessment. Preliminary findings suggested Crooks acted alone with no evidence of ties to larger conspiracies.
The investigation continues to probe Crooks' background for potential motives and any prior criminal activity, with no definitive motive established yet.
Sources:
The Spin
Establishment-critical narrative
The FBI investigation has been riddled with glaring procedural failures that cast serious doubt on its integrity. The FBI ignored key protocols by releasing the crime scene after only three days despite impending congressional scrutiny, removing crucial biological evidence, mishandling key items like a damaged hydraulic line, and even allowing the premature cremation of a suspect’s body with delayed autopsy reports. These actions severely undermine transparency and obstruct further inquiry.
Pro-establishment narrative
The investigation has been conducted in strict adherence to established procedures. Every step — from cleaning the crime scene to handling the suspect’s body — was coordinated with law enforcement partners and the coroner’s office. Allegations of obstruction are categorically false, as all actions were thoroughly documented and executed without undue haste. Transparency remains a top priority, with continuous briefings provided to Congress and the public throughout the ongoing investigation.
Congressional Task Force
In addition to the FBI investigation into the assassination attempt, a Congressional Task Force was established to conduct a parallel inquiry and propose reforms.
The House task force released its final 180-page report on Dec. 10, 2024. Led by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) and consisting of seven Republicans and six Democrats, the panel conducted 46 interviews with federal, state, and local law enforcement officials, reviewed 18K pages of documents, and visited the incident site.
The report concluded that the event was preventable, citing a series of security failures such as poor coordination between local law enforcement and the US Secret Service, inadequate planning, and the lack of a unified command center during the event.
To address these lapses, the task force made around three dozen recommendations, including reducing the number of individuals protected during campaign seasons, reevaluating the Secret Service’s role in investigating fraud and financial crimes, and improving communication protocols between federal and local agencies.
The report also called for increased funding for training and technology, the creation of a centralized threat-tracking database, and the establishment of an oversight committee to regularly review security measures for high-profile figures.
Secret Service Acting Director Ronald Rowe acknowledged the agency's "abject failure" in the July shooting and outlined subsequent changes.
The task force urged congressional committees to further investigate the shooter’s motivations, which remain largely unknown, aiming to strengthen security protocols for protecting high-profile individuals in the US.
The Spin
Pro-establishment narrative
The Congressional Task Force is a crucial step towards accountability and improving security measures. Its bipartisan nature ensures that the investigation is thorough and fair. The findings and recommendations, like enhanced communication protocols and legislative reforms, are necessary to prevent such failures in the future and protect high-profile figures more effectively. The additional oversight and resources are long overdue.
Establishment-critical narrative
The Congressional Task Force is more of a political spectacle than a meaningful effort to fix real issues. Despite extensive investigations and hearings, it's unlikely that new legislation or funding will address deeper flaws within the Secret Service or intelligence agencies. The focus on increased oversight and databases risks expanding bureaucracy rather than delivering real security improvements. This process seems more about optics than tangible change.
Fallout & Reform
Following the assassination attempt on Trump, deemed the most severe security failure in four decades, the Secret Service implemented new security measures aimed at addressing vulnerabilities and enhancing protection for high-profile figures during public events.
Large vehicles and banners are now used at outdoor events to obstruct lines of sight, preventing attacks from elevated positions. Bulletproof glass has become standard at outdoor gatherings.
A shift toward hosting more events indoors has also allowed for better control over security conditions. The Secret Service has expanded security perimeters, creating a larger buffer zone between crowds and protected individuals.
Additional personnel have been deployed to strengthen security presence and improve response capabilities. Experts have also recommended the use of aerial surveillance at outdoor events to monitor potential threats from elevated positions.
Various institutional and legislative actions were also taken in response. In addition to the Congressional task force set up and bipartisan review panel appointed by Alejandro Mayorka, Congress also passed legislation requiring that major presidential candidates receive protection similar to that of sitting presidents and vice presidents.
In addition, leadership changes followed at the Secret Service. Although Director Kimberly Cheatle initially stated she would not resign, maintaining support from the administration, she ultimately stepped down as scrutiny over the security lapses increased.
Acting Director Ronald Rowe has since focused on addressing the identified issues within the agency. Long-term adjustments include a reassessment of the Secret Service’s protective strategies to adapt to current threats. This involves increasing personnel, upgrading technical assets, and modernizing equipment. The incident has also led to a reevaluation of resource allocation.
Sources:
The Spin
Pro-establishment narrative
The security overhaul after the Trump assassination attempt is a necessary step to address serious flaws exposed in the system. It demonstrates a commitment to protecting political figures, especially amid a rising threat environment. These changes show that the government is taking the safety of its leaders seriously, adapting strategies to meet modern threats and ensuring incidents like this do not happen again.
Establishment-critical narrative
The reaction to the Trump assassination attempt is excessive and fails to address deeper issues within security agencies. Adding more barriers and bulletproof glass is merely a surface-level fix, while the fundamental problems—like communication failures and resource misallocation—remain. Leadership changes are more about political pressure than real accountability, and the new measures risk being more about optics than genuine improvement.
