Obama-appointed judge strikes down Trump order preventing asylum requests, protections for illegal immigrants
FOX NewsJUL 3
Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Asylum Ban at Southern Border
Above: Traffic backs up the San Ysidro Southbound Inspection as people enter Tijuana, Mexico, at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry on May 3, 2025, in San Diego, California. Image copyright: Kevin Carter/Getty Images
The Spin
Republican narrative
This ruling represents judicial overreach that undermines border security and national sovereignty. The president has clear constitutional authority to protect the nation from invasion, and activist judges shouldn't be able to force the country to accept unlimited asylum claims from anyone who crosses illegally. The asylum system has been massively abused, creating years-long backlogs while people live and work in America awaiting hearings.
Democratic narrative
The decision upholds the rule of law and separation of powers by preventing the president from unilaterally overriding congressional immigration statutes. Asylum is a legal right guaranteed by federal law and international commitments, even for those who cross between ports of entry. The ruling protects vulnerable people fleeing persecution while reaffirming that no president can ignore laws passed by Congress.