Harvard University back in court Monday to battle Trump admin’s $2.6 billion funding cuts
New York Post20 hrs
Harvard, Trump Admin Go to Court Over $2.6B Funding Freeze
Above: Protestors outside the John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse on July 21, 2025, in Boston, Massachusetts. Image copyright: Scott Eisen/Getty Images
The Spin
Republican narrative
Trump has clear authority to redirect funds from institutions misaligned with federal priorities, especially when such a powerful institution openly welcomes antisemitism on its campus. Through his apparent skepticism of Trump, the liberal Obama-appointed judge in this case is undermining legitimate contract disputes, favoring Harvard's faulty free speech claims over federal funding policy enforcement.
Democratic narrative
This lawsuit exposes Trump's broader agenda of using fear to control speech in America. Judge Burroughs is rightly questioning these arbitrary antisemitism claims, which not only lack evidence but also bypass due process. This retaliation threatens First Amendment rights and academic freedom, aiming to enforce ideological conformity across universities, hospitals, and beyond.
Establishment-critical narrative
Trump is using the same DEI tactics typically found on the left to now go after critics of a foreign country, likely due to pressure from billionaire donors who, instead of wanting an end to identity politics, want Israeli interests included. These elites had no issue with Harvard's divisive culture until the pro-Palestine movement blew up, and the only students who suffered were innocent Americans who had no representation in government or academia.